Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire – Compare and Contrast EssayGet Your
Starting at Just $13.90 a page
The novel Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is story full of adventure, action, and suspense, but only after the first 400 pages. The first part of the book is little more than an account of everyday life in a magical landscape. The story is really slow with nothing very interesting or exiting happening. On the other hand, when you finally get to the dramatic climax of the story, it is very well told. The movie is totally different. The director decided to add long fight scenes, such as the 2o minutes long battle scene with Harry fighting a dragon.
Instead of drawing in the viewers as it did in its previous films, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire preferred to be a more about special effects. The novel by J. K. Rowling was very much different than the movie with parts changed or cut and characters completely rethought, making it a pragmatic adaptation. A difference that I noticed was the maze as the third task in the Triwizard Tournament. It was completely wrong. The hedges did not move, there was no sphinx, acromantula, or Blast-Ended Screwts.
There weren’t any Blast-Ended Screwts in the movie at all, for that matter. The opponents had to navigate through a maze to get to the Triwizard Cup to win the tournament. This is shown quickly in the movie and the only consistent danger appears to be the collapsing of the walls, yet in the book Harry is forced to use his wit and knowledge of spells to plot his course and face various creatures. Secondly, Neville did not help Harry discover Gillyweed, Dobby did.
Originally, Mad-Eye had intended for Neville to show Harry the book he gave him, which contained a full explanation of Gillyweed. Dobby overheard Moody talking to McGonagall about Gillyweed, and relayed the message to Harry. Another detail that was changed was at the Quidditch match. Harry, Hermione and the Weasleys were supposed to be in a box with Cornelius Fudge, the Prime Minister from Bulgaria and Ludo Bagman, but instead they were stuck in the nosebleed section. Small bit, with not much importance to it but was messed up nevertheless.
Also at the Quidditch match, Winky was blamed for the stealing of Harry’s wand, and casting the spell that produced the Dark Mark. Winky was left out of the movie all together, which I thought was wrong. In the film, many parts were changed or cut out completely. I think that by doing this, the theme of the novel was modified and the true spirit of the book was lost. The movie was very much different from the book. It misconstrues so much of it. The book was very slow.
The author had taken the time to describe the setting, the mood, and so forth. The first part of the book had no action in it. The flow was very slow. The movie director changed all of that, and thought that by putting fight scenes and turning the novel into an “action movie” the audience would enjoy it more. I understand that when adapting a 600 page book into a two hour movie, scenes have to be cut out. Some people, like purists may criticize the loss of a character or chapter; however, the average audience member will enjoy it nevertheless.
Author: Brandon Johnson
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire – Compare and Contrast Essay
We have so large base of authors that we can prepare a unique summary of any book. Don't believe? Check it!
How fast would you like to get it?
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone: Book vs Movie Essay
1172 Words5 Pages
A movie that came out in 2002 was Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. This movie was based off the best-selling novel, which was written in 1997 by J.K. Rowling, called Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. If you were to read this book and watch the movie you would find many differences, but the main difference between the two is that the book gives more information to the reader than the movie gives to the viewer. If someone was to watch the movie instead of reading the book, that person would not be able to have an accurate perception of the book because so many things in the book are changed in the movie or parts are left out of the movie completely. This is mainly because the book has more characters and chapters, which are…show more content…
The book uses these faculty members to give an exciting look at the school and how it is ran, but by not having them in the movie the storyline is able to give more information on more important teachers like Dumbledore and Professor McGonagall. Hermes is Percy’s, Harry’s friend, owl. The owl is another example of how the book gives more background on the characters than the movie does. At the beginning of classes many students’ names are called out in the book. For example, Terry Boot, Hannah Abbott, and many other students’ names were called at the Sorting Hat’s ceremony, but in the movie only a couple of students are called out because of time restraint. The book is able to have a very profound way of keeping the reader entertained by having many exciting chapters like when Harry Potter battled Professor Quirrell, and the movie tries to keep the story exciting by deleting some chapters that the producer considered “not so important” to the storyline. On the other hand, the movie is shortened in a way of learning all the basics of the story and in an exciting visual way. The fact is that all of the chapters and all of the parts of the chapters were important to the storyline because without that extra information the reader is left without a feeling of complete knowledge of the plot. An example of a chapter being completely left out is the chapter called “The Midnight Duel” which has